Post-increment and pre-increment within a 'for' loop produce same output [duplicate]

Post-increment and pre-increment within a 'for' loop produce same output [duplicate]

c++ c for-loop operator-precedence

c

Why are these constructs using pre and post-increment undefined behavior?

c increment undefined-behavior operator-precedence sequence-points

c

Is short-circuiting logical operators mandated? And evaluation order?

c++ c logical-operators short-circuiting operator-precedence

c

Operator Precedence vs Order of Evaluation

c++ c operator-precedence

c

Operator precedence (bitwise '&' lower than '==')

c bitwise-operators operator-precedence

c

order of evaluation of operands

c++ c c++11 expression operator-precedence

c