Summing XML data that is in two arrays
Does the following do what you need it to?
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <root> <xsl:apply-templates select="//ItemCollection"/> </root> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="ItemCollection"> <xsl:variable name="itemCollection" select="." /> <xsl:variable name="itemsCount" select="count((.//IntensityArray)[1]//Intensity)" /> <xsl:for-each select="1 to $itemsCount"> <xsl:variable name="itemIndex" select="." /> <sum position="{$itemIndex}"> <xsl:value-of select="sum($itemCollection//IntensityArray//Intensity[$itemIndex])" /> </sum> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet>
I got the following output when I ran it on your sample data:
<root> <sum position="1">106.86959636211395</sum> <sum position="2">154.70708847045898</sum> <sum position="3">153.08208847045898</sum> <sum position="4">267.8320999145508</sum> <sum position="5">196.8874969482422</sum> <sum position="6">149.74459838867187</sum> <sum position="7">156.58208847045898</sum> <sum position="8">236.7624969482422</sum> <sum position="9">108.25000262260437</sum> <sum position="10">126.6500015258789</sum> <sum position="11">152.14999389648437</sum> <sum position="12">105.65709751844406</sum> <sum position="13">151.60709762573242</sum> <sum position="14">188.74459838867187</sum> <sum position="15">149.16250610351562</sum> <sum position="16">137.14999389648437</sum> <sum position="17">135.06958961486816</sum> <sum position="18">163.8374900817871</sum> <sum position="19">134.63208961486816</sum> <sum position="20">143.03750228881836</sum> <sum position="21">135.5749969482422</sum> <sum position="22">148.48750686645508</sum> <sum position="23">142.76250076293945</sum> <sum position="24">132.5749969482422</sum> <sum position="25">138.45709228515625</sum> <sum position="26">165.68749618530273</sum> <sum position="27">115.3000020980835</sum> <sum position="28">107.92500567436218</sum> <sum position="29">107.5500066280365</sum></root>
Updated:
Look at sum
function, e.g.:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/> <xsl:key name="k" match="Intensity" use="count(preceding-sibling::Intensity)"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <root> <xsl:apply-templates select="//Intensity[generate-id(.) = generate-id(key('k', count(preceding-sibling::Intensity)))]"/> </root> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="Intensity"> <sum> <xsl:value-of select="sum(key('k', count(preceding-sibling::Intensity)))"/> </sum> </xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet>
This template sums Intensity
elements for both IntensityArray
.
Output:
<root> <sum>106.86959636211395</sum> <sum>154.70708847045898</sum> <sum>153.08208847045898</sum> <sum>267.8320999145508</sum> <sum>196.8874969482422</sum> <sum>149.74459838867187</sum> <sum>156.58208847045898</sum> <sum>236.7624969482422</sum> <sum>108.25000262260437</sum> <sum>126.6500015258789</sum> <sum>152.14999389648437</sum> <sum>105.65709751844406</sum> <sum>151.60709762573242</sum> <sum>188.74459838867187</sum> <sum>149.16250610351562</sum> <sum>137.14999389648437</sum> <sum>135.06958961486816</sum> <sum>163.8374900817871</sum> <sum>134.63208961486816</sum> <sum>143.03750228881836</sum> <sum>135.5749969482422</sum> <sum>148.48750686645508</sum> <sum>142.76250076293945</sum> <sum>132.5749969482422</sum> <sum>138.45709228515625</sum> <sum>165.68749618530273</sum> <sum>115.3000020980835</sum> <sum>107.92500567436218</sum> <sum>107.5500066280365</sum></root>
This transformation produces the wanted result even in cays the two node-sets have different number of nodes and/or some of the nodes in the 2nd node-set don't have value that is castable to a number:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/> <xsl:strip-space elements="*"/> <xsl:variable name="vArr1" select= "/*/*/*/Item[1]/*/IntensityArray/*"/> <xsl:variable name="vArr2" select= "/*/*/*/Item[2]/*/IntensityArray/*"/> <xsl:variable name="vShorterArr" select= "$vArr1[not(count($vArr1) > count($vArr2))] | $vArr2[not(count($vArr2) >= count($vArr1))] "/> <xsl:variable name="vLongerArr" select= "$vArr2[not(count($vArr1) > count($vArr2))] | $vArr1[not(count($vArr2) >= count($vArr1))] "/> <xsl:template match="/"> <summedIntensities> <xsl:apply-templates select="$vLongerArr"/> </summedIntensities> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="Intensity"> <xsl:variable name="vPos" select="position()"/> <Intensity> <xsl:variable name="vVal2" select="$vShorterArr[position()=$vPos]"/> <xsl:value-of select= ". + concat('0', substring($vVal2, 1 div (number($vVal2) = number($vVal2)) ) ) "/> </Intensity> </xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet>
when this transformation is applied to the following XML document (the same as the provided one, but added to the first node-set one more Intensity
element (the last one), to make the two node-sets different in size):
<out_xml> <Root> <ItemCollection> <Item name="BaseLineOffSet" type="2"> <Histogram> <DispOrder>This is Order</DispOrder> <IntensityArray> <Intensity>105.84667205810547</Intensity> <Intensity>105.83854675292969</Intensity> <Intensity>105.57729339599609</Intensity> <Intensity>105.66104888916016</Intensity> <Intensity>105.56392669677734</Intensity> <Intensity>105.33917236328125</Intensity> <Intensity>105.33854675292969</Intensity> <Intensity>105.31544494628906</Intensity> <Intensity>105.40036010742187</Intensity> <Intensity>105.21470642089844</Intensity> <Intensity>105.14356994628906</Intensity> <Intensity>104.92792510986328</Intensity> <Intensity>104.93791961669922</Intensity> <Intensity>104.93979644775391</Intensity> <Intensity>104.96470642089844</Intensity> <Intensity>105.01107025146484</Intensity> <Intensity>104.76479339599609</Intensity> <Intensity>104.9085693359375</Intensity> <Intensity>104.70166778564453</Intensity> <Intensity>104.75499725341797</Intensity> <Intensity>104.77352905273437</Intensity> <Intensity>104.77714538574219</Intensity> <Intensity>104.59485626220703</Intensity> <Intensity>104.73235321044922</Intensity> <Intensity>104.35479736328125</Intensity> <Intensity>104.56911468505859</Intensity> <Intensity>104.38999938964844</Intensity> <Intensity>104.30992889404297</Intensity> <Intensity>104.37964630126953</Intensity> <Intensity>105.37964630126953</Intensity> </IntensityArray> </Histogram> </Item> <Item name="DispIntervalsMaxValues" type="2"> <Histogram> <DispOrder>This is Order</DispOrder> <IntensityArray> <Intensity>1.0229243040084839</Intensity> <Intensity>48.868541717529297</Intensity> <Intensity>47.504795074462891</Intensity> <Intensity>162.17105102539062</Intensity> <Intensity>91.323570251464844</Intensity> <Intensity>44.405426025390625</Intensity> <Intensity>51.243541717529297</Intensity> <Intensity>131.44705200195312</Intensity> <Intensity>2.8496425151824951</Intensity> <Intensity>21.435295104980469</Intensity> <Intensity>47.006423950195312</Intensity> <Intensity>0.72917240858078003</Intensity> <Intensity>46.669178009033203</Intensity> <Intensity>83.804801940917969</Intensity> <Intensity>44.197799682617187</Intensity> <Intensity>32.138923645019531</Intensity> <Intensity>30.30479621887207</Intensity> <Intensity>58.928920745849609</Intensity> <Intensity>29.930421829223633</Intensity> <Intensity>38.282505035400391</Intensity> <Intensity>30.801467895507813</Intensity> <Intensity>43.710361480712891</Intensity> <Intensity>38.167644500732422</Intensity> <Intensity>27.842643737792969</Intensity> <Intensity>34.102294921875</Intensity> <Intensity>61.118381500244141</Intensity> <Intensity>10.910002708435059</Intensity> <Intensity>3.6150767803192139</Intensity> <Intensity>3.1703603267669678</Intensity> </IntensityArray> </Histogram> </Item> </ItemCollection> </Root></out_xml>
the wanted, correct result is produced:
<summedIntensisites> <Intensity>106.86959636211395</Intensity> <Intensity>154.70708847045898</Intensity> <Intensity>153.08208847045898</Intensity> <Intensity>267.8320999145508</Intensity> <Intensity>196.8874969482422</Intensity> <Intensity>149.74459838867188</Intensity> <Intensity>156.58208847045898</Intensity> <Intensity>236.7624969482422</Intensity> <Intensity>108.25000262260437</Intensity> <Intensity>126.6500015258789</Intensity> <Intensity>152.14999389648438</Intensity> <Intensity>105.65709751844406</Intensity> <Intensity>151.60709762573242</Intensity> <Intensity>188.74459838867188</Intensity> <Intensity>149.16250610351562</Intensity> <Intensity>137.14999389648438</Intensity> <Intensity>135.06958961486816</Intensity> <Intensity>163.8374900817871</Intensity> <Intensity>134.63208961486816</Intensity> <Intensity>143.03750228881836</Intensity> <Intensity>135.5749969482422</Intensity> <Intensity>148.48750686645508</Intensity> <Intensity>142.76250076293945</Intensity> <Intensity>132.5749969482422</Intensity> <Intensity>138.45709228515625</Intensity> <Intensity>165.68749618530273</Intensity> <Intensity>115.3000020980835</Intensity> <Intensity>107.92500567436218</Intensity> <Intensity>107.5500066280365</Intensity> <Intensity>105.37964630126953</Intensity></summedIntensisites>
Explanation:
Two variables are defined, each containing the nodes that comprize an "array".
Another two variables are defined:
$vShorterArr
, containing the shorter node-set and$vLongerArr
containing the longer node-set.Templates are applied to the longer node-set.
Each node in the longer node-set is summed with the corresponding (if such exists) node in the shorter node-set, or with 0, otherwise.
II. XSLT 2.0 solution:
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/> <xsl:strip-space elements="*"/> <xsl:variable name="vArr1" select= "/*/*/*/Item[1]/*/IntensityArray/*/number()"/> <xsl:variable name="vArr2" select= "/*/*/*/Item[2]/*/IntensityArray/*/number()"/> <xsl:variable name="vShorterArr" select= "if(count($vArr1) lt count($vArr2)) then $vArr1 else $vArr2 "/> <xsl:variable name="vLongerArr" select= "if(count($vArr1) ge count($vArr2)) then $vArr1 else $vArr2 "/> <xsl:template match="/"> <summedIntensities> <xsl:for-each select="$vLongerArr"> <xsl:variable name="vPos" select="position()"/> <Intensity> <xsl:variable name="vVal2" select= "$vShorterArr[$vPos]"/> <xsl:sequence select= ". + (if($vVal2 castable as xs:double) then $vVal2 else 0 ) "/> </Intensity> </xsl:for-each> </summedIntensities> </xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet>
III. Using FXSL:
It is much easier to solve this problem using the f:zip-with()
function/template of FXSL.
Below is a solution using FXSL 2:
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:f="http://fxsl.sf.net/" exclude-result-prefixes="f"> <xsl:import href="../f/func-zipWithDVC.xsl"/> <xsl:import href="../f/func-Operators.xsl"/> <!-- To be applied on numList.xml --> <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <summedIntensities> <xsl:for-each select= "f:zipWith(f:add(), /*/*/*/Item[1]/*/IntensityArray/*/number(), /*/*/*/Item[2]/*/IntensityArray/*/number() )" > <Intensity> <xsl:sequence select="."/> </Intensity> </xsl:for-each> </summedIntensities> </xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet>