What is the advantage of linspace over the colon ":" operator?

It's not just the usability. Though the documentation says:

The linspace function generates linearly spaced vectors. It is similar to the colon operator :, but gives direct control over the number of points.

it is the same, the main difference and advantage of linspace is that it generates a vector of integers with the desired length (or default 100) and scales it afterwards to the desired range. The : colon creates the vector directly by increments.

Imagine you need to define bin edges for a histogram. And especially you need the certain bin edge 0.35 to be exactly on it's right place:

edges = [0.05:0.10:.55];X = edges == 0.35edges =   0.0500    0.1500    0.2500    0.3500    0.4500    0.5500X =  0     0     0     0     0     0

does not define the right bin edge, but:

edges = linspace(0.05,0.55,6);   %// 6 = (0.55-0.05)/0.1+1X = edges == 0.35edges =   0.0500    0.1500    0.2500    0.3500    0.4500    0.5500X =  0     0     0     1     0     0

does.

Well, it's basically a floating point issue. Which can be avoided by linspace, as a single division of an integer is not that delicate, like the cumulative sum of floting point numbers. But as Mark Dickinson pointed out in the comments:You shouldn't rely on any of the computed values being exactly what you expect. That is not what linspace is for. In my opinion it's a matter of how likely you will get floating point issues and how much you can reduce the probabilty for them or how small can you set the tolerances. Using linspace can reduce the probability of occurance of these issues, it's not a security.

That's the code of linspace:

n1 = n-1c = (d2 - d1).*(n1-1) % opposite signs may cause overflowif isinf(c)    y = d1 + (d2/n1).*(0:n1) - (d1/n1).*(0:n1)else    y = d1 + (0:n1).*(d2 - d1)/n1end

To sum up: linspace and colon are reliable at doing different tasks. linspace tries to ensure (as the name suggests) linear spacing, whereas colon tries to ensure symmetry

In your special case, as you create a vector of integers, there is no advantage of linspace (apart from usability), but when it comes to floating point delicate tasks, there may is.

The answer of Sam Roberts provides some additional information and clarifies further things, including some statements of MathWorks regarding the colon operator.

linspace and the colon operator do different things.

linspace creates a vector of integers of the specified length, and then scales it down to the specified interval with a division. In this way it ensures that the output vector is as linearly spaced as possible.

The colon operator adds increments to the starting point, and subtracts decrements from the end point to reach a middle point. In this way, it ensures that the output vector is as symmetric as possible.

The two methods thus have different aims, and will often give very slightly different answers, e.g.

>> a = 0:pi/1000:10*pi;>> b = linspace(0,10*pi,10001);>> all(a==b)ans =     0>> max(a-b)ans =   3.5527e-15

In practice, however, the differences will often have little impact unless you are interested in tiny numerical details. I find linspace more convenient when the number of gaps is easy to express, whereas I find the colon operator more convenient when the increment is easy to express.

See this MathWorks technical note for more detail on the algorithm behind the colon operator. For more detail on linspace, you can just type edit linspace to see exactly what it does.

linspace is useful where you know the number of elements you want rather than the size of the "step" between them. So if I said make a vector with 360 elements between 0 and 2*pi as a contrived example it's either going to be

linspace(0, 2*pi, 360)

or if you just had the colon operator you would have to manually calculate the step size:

0:(2*pi - 0)/(360-1):2*pi

linspace is just more convenient

For a simple real world application, see this answer where linspace is helpful in creating a custom colour map