When is an integer<->pointer cast actually correct?

I sometimes cast pointers to integers when they somehow need to be part of a hashsum. Also I cast them to integers to do some bitfiddling with them on certain implemetnations where it is guaranteed that pointers always have one or two spare bits left, where I can encode AVL or RB Tree information in the left/right pointers instead of having an additional member. But this is all so implementation specific that I recommend to never think about it as any kind of common solution. Also I heard that sometimes hazard pointers can be implemented with such a thing.

In some situations I need a unique ID per object that I pass along to e.g. servers as my request id. Depending on the context when I need to save some memory, and it is worth it, I use the address of my object as such an id, and usually have to cast it to an integer.

When working with embedded systems (such as in canon cameras, see chdk) there are often magic addesses, so a (void*)0xFFBC5235 or similar is often found there too

edit:

Just stumbled (in my mind) over pthread_self() which returns a pthread_t which is usually a typedef to an unsigned integer. Internally though it is a pointer to some thread struct, representing the thread in question. In general it might used elsewhere for an opaque handle.

It could be useful when checking the alignment of types in general so that misaligned memory gets caught with an assert rather than just SIGBUS/SIGSEGV.

E.g.:

#include <xmmintrin.h>#include <assert.h>#include <stdint.h>int main() {  void *ptr = malloc(sizeof(__m128));  assert(!((intptr_t)ptr) % __alignof__(__m128));  return 0;}

(In real code I wouldn't just gamble on malloc, but it illustrates the point)

Storing a doubly linked list using half the space

A XOR Linked List combines the next and prev pointers into a single value of the same size. It does this by xor-ing the two pointers together, which requires treating them like integers.