What is the purpose of XCTestCase's setUp method? What is the purpose of XCTestCase's setUp method? ios ios

What is the purpose of XCTestCase's setUp method?


There are a couple of points for discussion here: the behaviour of the setUp methods, and general best testing practices.

There are actually two setUp methods:

+ (void)setUp;- (void)setUp;

The class method (+ (void)setUp) is only run once during the entire test run.

The instance method (- (void)setUp) is the one in the default template; it's run before every single test. Hopefully, in a hypothetical future version of Xcode, this comment will have been changed to // Put setup code here. This method is called before the invocation of each test method in the class. WINK WINK

So through these two methods, both of the behaviours you described are possible.

Regarding your comment:

"Surely developers aren't creating objects in it over and over?"

My answer would be "Yes, they usually are". A popular acronym for 'good' unit tests is FIRST:

  • Fast
  • Isolated
  • Repeatable
  • Self-Verifying
  • Timely

Isolated is key to this discussion: your tests shouldn't rely on any previous state left behind by other tests. Ideally, you should tear down and recreate your in-memory Core Data stack for every test, so you know that you're starting from a clean slate. A good example is in this post by Graham Lee. You want to use an in-memory stack because a) you can easily throw it away, and b) it should be very fast because it's just in-memory and not hitting your disk.

If you find that your tests are running slowly as a result of this (don't optimize prematurely), then I think a reasonable next step would be to create the stack in your + (void)setUp method, but create a brand new context every time in your - (void)setUp method.


I came here with almost the same problem: how to perform the setUp just once and in Swift. Here is the solution:

override class func setUp() {    super.setUp()        // ...}override class func tearDown() {        // ...    super.tearDown()}

Right now I'm still looking for a solution for an asynchronous setUp!