Why can't you use cat to read a file line by line where each line has delimiters
The problem is not in cat
, nor in the for
loop per se; it is in the use of back quotes. When you write either:
for i in `cat file`
or (better):
for i in $(cat file)
or (in bash
):
for i in $(<file)
the shell executes the command and captures the output as a string, separating the words at the characters in $IFS
. If you want lines input to $i
, you either have to fiddle with IFS
or use the while
loop. The while
loop is better if there's any danger that the files processed will be large; it doesn't have to read the whole file into memory all at once, unlike the versions using $(...)
.
IFS=''for i in $(<file)do echo "$i"done
The quotes around the "$i"
are generally a good idea. In this context, with the modified $IFS
, it actually isn't critical, but good habits are good habits even so. It matters in the following script:
old="$IFS"IFS=''for i in $(<file)do ( IFS="$old" echo "$i" )done
when the data file contains multiple spaces between words:
$ cat fileabc 123, commathe quick brown foxjumped over the lazy dogcomma, comma$
Output:
$ sh bq.shabc 123, commathe quick brown foxjumped over the lazy dogcomma, comma$
Without the double quotes:
$ cat bq.shold="$IFS"IFS=''for i in $(<file)do ( IFS="$old" echo $i )done$ sh bq.shabc 123, commathe quick brown foxjumped over the lazy dogcomma, comma$
the for loop coupled with a change of the internal field separator(IFS) will read file as intended
for an input
abc 123, commathe quick brown foxjumped over the lazy dogcomma, comma
For loop coupled with an IFS change
old_IFS=$IFSIFS=$'\n'for i in `cat file`do echo $idoneIFS=$old_IFS
results in
abc 123, commathe quick brown foxjumped over the lazy dogcomma, comma