Advantages to using URLField over TextField?

URLField is actually CharField w/ supporting of Regexp-based URL pattern checking and a online validator(which was replaced by a RegEx based validator), you could use TextField if you don't care length-limitation of URL

from django.core.validators import URLValidator# in modelfield = models.TextField(validators=[URLValidator()])

Furthermore, using of CharField or TextField depends on whether you want max-length constraint on the field, and which element type is more suitable for editing: textarea or input. On PostgreSQL side, there is no significant difference.

Try this class:

class LongURLField(TextField):    description = 'Long URL'    def __init__(self, verbose_name=None, name=None, **kwargs):        TextField.__init__(self, verbose_name, name, **kwargs)        self.validators.append(validators.URLValidator())    def formfield(self, **kwargs):        # As with TextField, this will cause URL validation to be performed        # twice.        defaults = {            'form_class': forms.URLField,        }        defaults.update(kwargs)        return super(LongURLField, self).formfield(**defaults)

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#urlfieldOf course you can use CharField/TextField but handling user input and be sure whatever user enters is up-to you.

From the source code:

# As with CharField, this will cause URL validation to be performed

If you see the URLField source code you will find it's actually a CharField with URL validator.

Also there is other ready to use fields such as EmailField, ImageField, *Field!