Class inheritance in Python 3.7 dataclasses
The way dataclasses combines attributes prevents you from being able to use attributes with defaults in a base class and then use attributes without a default (positional attributes) in a subclass.
That's because the attributes are combined by starting from the bottom of the MRO, and building up an ordered list of the attributes in first-seen order; overrides are kept in their original location. So Parent
starts out with ['name', 'age', 'ugly']
, where ugly
has a default, and then Child
adds ['school']
to the end of that list (with ugly
already in the list). This means you end up with ['name', 'age', 'ugly', 'school']
and because school
doesn't have a default, this results in an invalid argument listing for __init__
.
This is documented in PEP-557 Dataclasses, under inheritance:
When the Data Class is being created by the
@dataclass
decorator, it looks through all of the class's base classes in reverse MRO (that is, starting atobject
) and, for each Data Class that it finds, adds the fields from that base class to an ordered mapping of fields. After all of the base class fields are added, it adds its own fields to the ordered mapping. All of the generated methods will use this combined, calculated ordered mapping of fields. Because the fields are in insertion order, derived classes override base classes.
and under Specification:
TypeError
will be raised if a field without a default value follows a field with a default value. This is true either when this occurs in a single class, or as a result of class inheritance.
You do have a few options here to avoid this issue.
The first option is to use separate base classes to force fields with defaults into a later position in the MRO order. At all cost, avoid setting fields directly on classes that are to be used as base classes, such as Parent
.
The following class hierarchy works:
# base classes with fields; fields without defaults separate from fields with.@dataclassclass _ParentBase: name: str age: int@dataclassclass _ParentDefaultsBase: ugly: bool = False@dataclassclass _ChildBase(_ParentBase): school: str@dataclassclass _ChildDefaultsBase(_ParentDefaultsBase): ugly: bool = True# public classes, deriving from base-with, base-without field classes# subclasses of public classes should put the public base class up front.@dataclassclass Parent(_ParentDefaultsBase, _ParentBase): def print_name(self): print(self.name) def print_age(self): print(self.age) def print_id(self): print(f"The Name is {self.name} and {self.name} is {self.age} year old")@dataclassclass Child(Parent, _ChildDefaultsBase, _ChildBase): pass
By pulling out fields into separate base classes with fields without defaults and fields with defaults, and a carefully selected inheritance order, you can produce an MRO that puts all fields without defaults before those with defaults. The reversed MRO (ignoring object
) for Child
is:
_ParentBase_ChildBase_ParentDefaultsBase_ChildDefaultsBaseParent
Note that Parent
doesn't set any new fields, so it doesn't matter here that it ends up 'last' in the field listing order. The classes with fields without defaults (_ParentBase
and _ChildBase
) precede the classes with fields with defaults (_ParentDefaultsBase
and _ChildDefaultsBase
).
The result is Parent
and Child
classes with a sane field older, while Child
is still a subclass of Parent
:
>>> from inspect import signature>>> signature(Parent)<Signature (name: str, age: int, ugly: bool = False) -> None>>>> signature(Child)<Signature (name: str, age: int, school: str, ugly: bool = True) -> None>>>> issubclass(Child, Parent)True
and so you can create instances of both classes:
>>> jack = Parent('jack snr', 32, ugly=True)>>> jack_son = Child('jack jnr', 12, school='havard', ugly=True)>>> jackParent(name='jack snr', age=32, ugly=True)>>> jack_sonChild(name='jack jnr', age=12, school='havard', ugly=True)
Another option is to only use fields with defaults; you can still make in an error to not supply a school
value, by raising one in __post_init__
:
_no_default = object()@dataclassclass Child(Parent): school: str = _no_default ugly: bool = True def __post_init__(self): if self.school is _no_default: raise TypeError("__init__ missing 1 required argument: 'school'")
but this does alter the field order; school
ends up after ugly
:
<Signature (name: str, age: int, ugly: bool = True, school: str = <object object at 0x1101d1210>) -> None>
and a type hint checker will complain about _no_default
not being a string.
You can also use the attrs
project, which was the project that inspired dataclasses
. It uses a different inheritance merging strategy; it pulls overridden fields in a subclass to the end of the fields list, so ['name', 'age', 'ugly']
in the Parent
class becomes ['name', 'age', 'school', 'ugly']
in the Child
class; by overriding the field with a default, attrs
allows the override without needing to do a MRO dance.
attrs
supports defining fields without type hints, but lets stick to the supported type hinting mode by setting auto_attribs=True
:
import attr@attr.s(auto_attribs=True)class Parent: name: str age: int ugly: bool = False def print_name(self): print(self.name) def print_age(self): print(self.age) def print_id(self): print(f"The Name is {self.name} and {self.name} is {self.age} year old")@attr.s(auto_attribs=True)class Child(Parent): school: str ugly: bool = True
You can use attributes with defaults in parent classes if you exclude them from the init function. If you need the possibility to override the default at init, extend the code with the answer of Praveen Kulkarni.
from dataclasses import dataclass, field@dataclassclass Parent: name: str age: int ugly: bool = field(default=False, init=False)@dataclassclass Child(Parent): school: strjack = Parent('jack snr', 32)jack_son = Child('jack jnr', 12, school = 'havard')jack_son.ugly = True
The approach below deals with this problem while using pure python dataclasses
and without much boilerplate code.
The ugly_init: dataclasses.InitVar[bool]
serves as a pseudo-field just to help us do initialization and will be lost once the instance is created. While ugly: bool = field(init=False)
is an instance member which will not be initialized by __init__
method but can be alternatively initialized using __post_init__
method (you can find more here.).
from dataclasses import dataclass, field@dataclassclass Parent: name: str age: int ugly: bool = field(init=False) ugly_init: dataclasses.InitVar[bool] def __post_init__(self, ugly_init: bool): self.ugly = ugly_init def print_name(self): print(self.name) def print_age(self): print(self.age) def print_id(self): print(f'The Name is {self.name} and {self.name} is {self.age} year old')@dataclassclass Child(Parent): school: strjack = Parent('jack snr', 32, ugly_init=True)jack_son = Child('jack jnr', 12, school='havard', ugly_init=True)jack.print_id()jack_son.print_id()
If you want to use a pattern where ugly_init
is optional, you can define a class method on the Parent that includes ugly_init
as an optional parameter:
from dataclasses import dataclass, field, InitVar@dataclassclass Parent: name: str age: int ugly: bool = field(init=False) ugly_init: InitVar[bool] def __post_init__(self, ugly_init: bool): self.ugly = ugly_init @classmethod def create(cls, ugly_init=True, **kwargs): return cls(ugly_init=ugly_init, **kwargs) def print_name(self): print(self.name) def print_age(self): print(self.age) def print_id(self): print(f'The Name is {self.name} and {self.name} is {self.age} year old')@dataclassclass Child(Parent): school: strjack = Parent.create(name='jack snr', age=32, ugly_init=False)jack_son = Child.create(name='jack jnr', age=12, school='harvard')jack.print_id()jack_son.print_id()
Now you can use the create
class method as a factory method for creating Parent/Child classes with a default value for ugly_init
. Note you must use named parameters for this approach to work.