Python C extension: Use extension PYD or DLL? Python C extension: Use extension PYD or DLL? python python

Python C extension: Use extension PYD or DLL?


pyd files are just dll files ready for python importing.

To distinguish them from normal dlls, I recommend .pyd not .dll in windows.

Here is the official doc about this issue:

http://docs.python.org/faq/windows.html#is-a-pyd-file-the-same-as-a-dll


According to the Creating Your Own Project step (Step 7 of "The Cookbook Approach") of Building C and C++ Extensions on Windows

The output file should be called spam.pyd (in Release mode) or spam_d.pyd (in Debug mode). The extension .pyd was chosen to avoid confusion with a system library spam.dll to which your module could be a Python interface.

So a .pyd file is just a DLL renamed to save on confusion.

On linux however, speaking from experience it seems that you need to use the .so extension for python dlls. This is just a standard unix shared library. I can't provide a source or reason for why python on linux does not change the file extension, however I can show you how to demonstrate it. At the shell, run the following:

python -vv>>> import fakemodule

You'll notice that the output shows:

trying /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/fakemodule.so


Presuming your Python extension foo is intended to be used as a module, accessible via import foo, you don't need to know what the filename extension should be on what operating system. You just use distutils. You will get a .pyd on Windows, and a .so on Linux etc. Read this documentation.

Update in response to comment by @gecco

import foo is working both both extension types: dll and pyd. The extension does not matter here... :

For me (Python 2.7.1, Windows 7), python -vv shows only pyd, py, pyw and pyc extensions (in that order) being searched. If I have foo.pyd in C:\python27\lib\site-packages, import foo works. If I rename that file to foo.dll, import foo fails.