Python Mixin - Unresolved Attribute Reference [PyCharm]
Declare the necessary fields in the Mixin like:
class Mixin: foo: str def complex_operation(self): return self.foo.capitalize()
This way the mixin actually declares the fields a class must have to be able to use this mixin. Type hint will create warnings if extending class will put incompatible type into declared field.
edit: Replaced foo = None with foo:str as suggested by @valex
I see few options.
1) Type annotations (i think this is cleanest solution):
class Mixin: foo: str def complex_operation(self): return self.foo.capitalize()
2) Default None
(@ikamen option):
class Mixin: foo = None def complex_operation(self): return self.foo.capitalize()
3) Suppress unresolved reference error for class or for specific line (i think this is more dirty way than first two):
# noinspection PyUnresolvedReferencesclass Mixin: def complex_operation(self): return self.foo.capitalize()
class Mixin: def complex_operation(self): # noinspection PyUnresolvedReferences return self.foo.capitalize()
So just to compiling my thoughts from the comments for everyone else: The problem is keeping the two classes intrinsically connected while separating functionality. Here are my solutions:
1) Make a module
Have another file, say mixin.py
, that has complex_operation
as a function. Instead of accepting self
as a parameter, have it take a string:
# mixin.pydef complex_operation (foo: str) -> str: return foo.capitalize()# main.pyfrom ai import complex_operationclass A: def __init__(self): self.foo = "foo"print (complex_operation (A().foo))
2) Make a class to accept another class as a parameter
In Mixin
's __init__
function, add a parameter to accept an A
, and then use that in its methods:
# mixin.pyclass Mixin: def __init__(self, a: A): self.a = a def complex_operation(self): return self.a.foo.capitalize()# main.pyfrom mixin import Mixinclass A: def __init__(self): self.foo = "foo"print (Mixin (A()).complex_operation())