Remap values in pandas column with a dict Remap values in pandas column with a dict python python

Remap values in pandas column with a dict


You can use .replace. For example:

>>> df = pd.DataFrame({'col2': {0: 'a', 1: 2, 2: np.nan}, 'col1': {0: 'w', 1: 1, 2: 2}})>>> di = {1: "A", 2: "B"}>>> df  col1 col20    w    a1    1    22    2  NaN>>> df.replace({"col1": di})  col1 col20    w    a1    A    22    B  NaN

or directly on the Series, i.e. df["col1"].replace(di, inplace=True).


map can be much faster than replace

If your dictionary has more than a couple of keys, using map can be much faster than replace. There are two versions of this approach, depending on whether your dictionary exhaustively maps all possible values (and also whether you want non-matches to keep their values or be converted to NaNs):

Exhaustive Mapping

In this case, the form is very simple:

df['col1'].map(di)       # note: if the dictionary does not exhaustively map all                         # entries then non-matched entries are changed to NaNs

Although map most commonly takes a function as its argument, it can alternatively take a dictionary or series: Documentation for Pandas.series.map

Non-Exhaustive Mapping

If you have a non-exhaustive mapping and wish to retain the existing variables for non-matches, you can add fillna:

df['col1'].map(di).fillna(df['col1'])

as in @jpp's answer here: Replace values in a pandas series via dictionary efficiently

Benchmarks

Using the following data with pandas version 0.23.1:

di = {1: "A", 2: "B", 3: "C", 4: "D", 5: "E", 6: "F", 7: "G", 8: "H" }df = pd.DataFrame({ 'col1': np.random.choice( range(1,9), 100000 ) })

and testing with %timeit, it appears that map is approximately 10x faster than replace.

Note that your speedup with map will vary with your data. The largest speedup appears to be with large dictionaries and exhaustive replaces. See @jpp answer (linked above) for more extensive benchmarks and discussion.


There is a bit of ambiguity in your question. There are at least three two interpretations:

  1. the keys in di refer to index values
  2. the keys in di refer to df['col1'] values
  3. the keys in di refer to index locations (not the OP's question, but thrown in for fun.)

Below is a solution for each case.


Case 1:If the keys of di are meant to refer to index values, then you could use the update method:

df['col1'].update(pd.Series(di))

For example,

import pandas as pdimport numpy as npdf = pd.DataFrame({'col1':['w', 10, 20],                   'col2': ['a', 30, np.nan]},                  index=[1,2,0])#   col1 col2# 1    w    a# 2   10   30# 0   20  NaNdi = {0: "A", 2: "B"}# The value at the 0-index is mapped to 'A', the value at the 2-index is mapped to 'B'df['col1'].update(pd.Series(di))print(df)

yields

  col1 col21    w    a2    B   300    A  NaN

I've modified the values from your original post so it is clearer what update is doing.Note how the keys in di are associated with index values. The order of the index values -- that is, the index locations -- does not matter.


Case 2:If the keys in di refer to df['col1'] values, then @DanAllan and @DSM show how to achieve this with replace:

import pandas as pdimport numpy as npdf = pd.DataFrame({'col1':['w', 10, 20],                   'col2': ['a', 30, np.nan]},                  index=[1,2,0])print(df)#   col1 col2# 1    w    a# 2   10   30# 0   20  NaNdi = {10: "A", 20: "B"}# The values 10 and 20 are replaced by 'A' and 'B'df['col1'].replace(di, inplace=True)print(df)

yields

  col1 col21    w    a2    A   300    B  NaN

Note how in this case the keys in di were changed to match values in df['col1'].


Case 3:If the keys in di refer to index locations, then you could use

df['col1'].put(di.keys(), di.values())

since

df = pd.DataFrame({'col1':['w', 10, 20],                   'col2': ['a', 30, np.nan]},                  index=[1,2,0])di = {0: "A", 2: "B"}# The values at the 0 and 2 index locations are replaced by 'A' and 'B'df['col1'].put(di.keys(), di.values())print(df)

yields

  col1 col21    A    a2   10   300    B  NaN

Here, the first and third rows were altered, because the keys in di are 0 and 2, which with Python's 0-based indexing refer to the first and third locations.