Why can a Python dict have multiple keys with the same hash?

Here is everything about Python dicts that I was able to put together (probably more than anyone would like to know; but the answer is comprehensive). A shout out to Duncan for pointing out that Python dicts use slots and leading me down this rabbit hole.

• Python dictionaries are implemented as hash tables.
• Hash tables must allow for hash collisions i.e. even if two keys have same hash value, the implementation of the table must have a strategy to insert and retrieve the key and value pairs unambiguously.
• Python dict uses open addressing to resolve hash collisions (explained below) (see dictobject.c:296-297).
• Python hash table is just a continguous block of memory (sort of like an array, so you can do O(1) lookup by index).
• Each slot in the table can store one and only one entry. This is important
• Each entry in the table actually a combination of the three values - . This is implemented as a C struct (see dictobject.h:51-56)

• The figure below is a logical representation of a python hash table. In the figure below, 0, 1, ..., i, ... on the left are indices of the slots in the hash table (they are just for illustrative purposes and are not stored along with the table obviously!).

  # Logical model of Python Hash table-+-----------------+0| <hash|key|value>|-+-----------------+1|      ...        |-+-----------------+.|      ...        |-+-----------------+i|      ...        |-+-----------------+.|      ...        |-+-----------------+n|      ...        |-+-----------------+

• When a new dict is initialized it starts with 8 slots. (see dictobject.h:49)

• When adding entries to the table, we start with some slot, i that is based on the hash of the key. CPython uses initial i = hash(key) & mask. Where mask = PyDictMINSIZE - 1, but that's not really important). Just note that the initial slot, i, that is checked depends on the hash of the key.
• If that slot is empty, the entry is added to the slot (by entry, I mean, <hash|key|value>). But what if that slot is occupied!? Most likely because another entry has the same hash (hash collision!)
• If the slot is occupied, CPython (and even PyPy) compares the the hash AND the key (by compare I mean == comparison not the is comparison) of the entry in the slot against the key of the current entry to be inserted (dictobject.c:337,344-345). If both match, then it thinks the entry already exists, gives up and moves on to the next entry to be inserted. If either hash or the key don't match, it starts probing.
• Probing just means it searches the slots by slot to find an empty slot. Technically we could just go one by one, i+1, i+2, ... and use the first available one (that's linear probing). But for reasons explained beautifully in the comments (see dictobject.c:33-126), CPython uses random probing. In random probing, the next slot is picked in a pseudo random order. The entry is added to the first empty slot. For this discussion, the actual algorithm used to pick the next slot is not really important (see dictobject.c:33-126 for the algorithm for probing). What is important is that the slots are probed until first empty slot is found.
• The same thing happens for lookups, just starts with the initial slot i (where i depends on the hash of the key). If the hash and the key both don't match the entry in the slot, it starts probing, until it finds a slot with a match. If all slots are exhausted, it reports a fail.
• BTW, the dict will be resized if it is two-thirds full. This avoids slowing down lookups. (see dictobject.h:64-65)

There you go! The Python implementation of dict checks for both hash equality of two keys and the normal equality (==) of the keys when inserting items. So in summary, if there are two keys, a and b and hash(a)==hash(b), but a!=b, then both can exist harmoniously in a Python dict. But if hash(a)==hash(b) and a==b, then they cannot both be in the same dict.

Because we have to probe after every hash collision, one side effect of too many hash collisions is that the lookups and insertions will become very slow (as Duncan points out in the comments).

I guess the short answer to my question is, "Because that's how it's implemented in the source code ;)"

While this is good to know (for geek points?), I am not sure how it can be used in real life. Because unless you are trying to explicitly break something, why would two objects that are not equal, have same hash?