Validate uniqueness of multiple columns

You can scope a validates_uniqueness_of call as follows.

validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => :friend_id

You can use validates to validate uniqueness on one column:

validates :user_id, uniqueness: {scope: :friend_id}

The syntax for the validation on multiple columns is similar, but you should provide an array of fields instead:

validates :attr, uniqueness: {scope: [:attr1, ... , :attrn]}

However, validation approaches shown above have a race condition and can’t ensure consistency. Consider the following example:

1. database table records are supposed to be unique by n fields;

2. multiple (two or more) concurrent requests, handled by separate processes each (application servers, background worker servers or whatever you are using), access database to insert the same record in table;

3. each process in parallel validates if there is a record with the same n fields;

4. validation for each request is passed successfully, and each process creates a record in the table with the same data.

To avoid this kind of behaviour, one should add a unique constraint to db table. You can set it with add_index helper for one (or multiple) field(s) by running the following migration:

class AddUniqueConstraints < ActiveRecord::Migration  def change   add_index :table_name, [:field1, ... , :fieldn], unique: true  endend

Caveat : even after you've set a unique constraint, two or more concurrent requests will try to write the same data to db, but instead of creating duplicate records, this will raise an ActiveRecord::RecordNotUnique exception, which you should handle separately:

begin# writing to databaserescue ActiveRecord::RecordNotUnique => e# handling the case when record already existsend 

This can be done with a database constraint on the two columns:

add_index :friendships, [:user_id, :friend_id], unique: true

You could use a rails validator, but in general I recommend using a database constraint.

More reading: https://robots.thoughtbot.com/validation-database-constraint-or-both