What is the difference bewteen ifnull and coalesce in mysql?

The main difference between the two is that IFNULL function takes two arguments and returns the first one if it's not NULL or the second if the first one is NULL.

COALESCE function can take two or more parameters and returns the first non-NULL parameter, or NULL if all parameters are null, for example:

SELECT IFNULL('some value', 'some other value');-> returns 'some value'SELECT IFNULL(NULL,'some other value');-> returns 'some other value'SELECT COALESCE(NULL, 'some other value');-> returns 'some other value' - equivalent of the IFNULL functionSELECT COALESCE(NULL, 'some value', 'some other value');-> returns 'some value'SELECT COALESCE(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 'first non-null value');-> returns 'first non-null value'

UPDATE: MSSQL does stricter type and parameter checking. Further, it doesn't have IFNULL function but instead ISNULL function, which needs to know the types of the arguments. Therefore:

SELECT ISNULL(NULL, NULL);-> results in an errorSELECT ISNULL(NULL, CAST(NULL as VARCHAR));-> returns NULL

Also COALESCE function in MSSQL requires at least one parameter to be non-null, therefore:

SELECT COALESCE(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);-> results in an errorSELECT COALESCE(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 'first non-null value');-> returns 'first non-null value'

Pros of COALESCE

• COALESCE is SQL-standard function.

  While IFNULL is MySQL-specific and its equivalent in MSSQL (ISNULL) is MSSQL-specific.

• COALESCE can work with two or more arguments (in fact, it can work with a single argument, but is pretty useless in this case: COALESCE(a)≡a).

  While MySQL's IFNULL and MSSQL's ISNULL are limited versions of COALESCE that can work with two arguments only.

Cons of COALESCE

• Per Transact SQL documentation, COALESCE is just a syntax sugar for CASE and can evaluate its arguments more that once. In more detail: COALESCE(a1, a2, …, aN)≡CASE WHEN (a1 IS NOT NULL) THEN a1 WHEN (a2 IS NOT NULL) THEN a2 ELSE aN END. This greatly reduces the usefulness of COALESCE in MSSQL.

  On the other hand, ISNULL in MSSQL is a normal function and never evaluates its arguments more than once. COALESCE in MySQL and PostgreSQL neither evaluates its arguments more than once.

• At this point of time, I don't know how exactly SQL-standards define COALESCE.

  As we see from previous point, actual implementations in RDBMS vary: some (e.g. MSSQL) make COALESCE to evaluate its arguments more than once, some (e.g. MySQL, PostgreSQL) — don't.

  c-treeACE, which claims it's COALESCE implementation is SQL-92 compatible, says: "This function is not allowed in a GROUP BY clause. Arguments to this function cannot be query expressions." I don't know whether these restrictions are really within SQL-standard; most actual implementations of COALESCE (e.g. MySQL, PostgreSQL) don't have such restrictions. IFNULL/ISNULL, as normal functions, don't have such restrictions either.

Resume

Unless you face specific restrictions of COALESCE in specific RDBMS, I'd recommend to always use COALESCE as more standard and more generic.

The exceptions are:

• Long-calculated expressions or expressions with side effects in MSSQL (as, per documentation, COALESCE(expr1, …) may evaluate expr1 twice).
• Usage within GROUP BY or with query expressions in c-treeACE.
• Etc.

Differences in SQL-Server:

• There is no IFNULL() function but a similar ISNULL()

• ISNULL takes only 2 parameters whereas COALESCE takes variable number of parameters

• COALESCE is based on the ANSI SQL standard whereas ISNULL is a proprietary TSQL function

• Validations for ISNULL and COALESCE is also different. For example, NULL value for ISNULL is converted to int, whereas for COAELSCE you have to provide a type. Ex:

  • ISNULL(NULL,NULL) : is int.

  • COALESCE(NULL,NULL) : will throw an error.

  • COALESCE(CAST(NULL as int),NULL) : is valid and returns int.

• Data type determination of the resulting expression – ISNULL uses the first parameter type, COALESCE follows the CASE expression rules and returns type of value with highest precedence.